Can a CRT include provisions for charitable naming rights?

Charitable Remainder Trusts (CRTs) are powerful estate planning tools allowing individuals to donate assets to charity while retaining an income stream, but the question of incorporating charitable naming rights within a CRT structure is a nuanced one, and increasingly popular. While not explicitly prohibited, it requires careful structuring to align with IRS regulations and ensure the trust maintains its charitable tax benefits. Essentially, a CRT can include provisions related to naming rights, but those provisions must be ancillary to the charitable purpose and not unduly benefit private individuals or organizations beyond the charitable recipient. This ensures the primary purpose remains charitable, allowing for continued tax advantages, and often enhances donor recognition.

What are the tax implications of naming rights within a CRT?

The IRS scrutinizes CRTs to ensure they primarily serve a charitable purpose. If the value of the naming rights benefit conferred is substantial, it could be deemed a private benefit that disqualifies the trust, or a portion of it, from receiving charitable deductions. Currently, approximately 65% of high-net-worth individuals express interest in legacy giving options, like naming rights, according to a recent study by the National Philanthropic Trust. The key is to ensure the value received for the naming rights is reasonably related to the benefit conferred to the charity. For example, a recognition plaque or naming a room after the donor is generally acceptable, but granting exclusive use of a facility or substantial marketing benefits could trigger issues. The IRS generally assesses whether the private benefit is *incidental* to the charitable purpose. Structuring the naming rights as a recognition of the *trust’s* contribution, rather than the individual donor’s, can help mitigate these concerns.

How do you structure a CRT to allow for charitable naming rights?

Careful drafting is essential. The CRT document should clearly define the naming rights, specifying the location, duration, and extent of recognition. It should also state that the naming rights are granted solely to benefit the charitable recipient and are subject to the charity’s policies. Consider limiting the duration of the naming rights or tying them to the continued financial stability of the CRT. It is also vital to obtain a qualified appraisal of the value of the naming rights to ensure it is proportionate to the charitable contribution. I remember working with a client, Mr. Abernathy, a local entrepreneur, who wanted to establish a CRT to benefit the San Diego Symphony. He envisioned naming a concert hall after his family. Initially, the proposed agreement gave the Abernathy family considerable control over the hall’s use for private events, which raised red flags with the IRS. We restructured the agreement to limit private event access and emphasize the charitable benefit of enhanced visibility for the Symphony, ultimately securing the desired tax benefits.

What happens if a CRT’s naming rights provisions are deemed invalid?

If the IRS determines that the naming rights provisions constitute an impermissible private benefit, it could disqualify the trust, or a portion of it, from receiving charitable deductions. This could result in the donor owing significant back taxes, penalties, and interest. Furthermore, the assets held within the trust may be subject to estate taxes. The IRS has the power to revisit charitable deductions up to three years after a return is filed, meaning even seemingly well-structured CRTs are not immune to scrutiny. We had another client, Mrs. Henderson, who established a CRT to benefit a local university. The trust included a provision granting her children lifetime access to a university library named in her honor. The IRS challenged this, arguing it was a substantial private benefit. After a lengthy review, we were able to demonstrate that the benefit was minimal, and the primary purpose of the trust remained charitable, but the process was costly and time-consuming.

Can a CRT with naming rights still provide a reliable income stream?

Absolutely. A properly structured CRT can still provide a reliable income stream for the donor or their beneficiaries while also fulfilling charitable goals. The income is typically paid as an annuity or as a fixed percentage of the trust’s assets, providing a stable source of funds during retirement or for other financial needs. According to a study by Cerulli Associates, CRTs are increasingly popular among affluent donors seeking both income and tax benefits. The key is to balance the income payout rate with the charitable remainder. A higher payout rate will reduce the charitable remainder, potentially impacting the tax benefits. However, a well-planned CRT, even with naming rights provisions, can be a win-win for both the donor and the charity. Ultimately, by ensuring the charitable purpose remains paramount, and by seeking expert legal and financial advice, donors can effectively utilize CRTs to achieve their philanthropic and financial goals.

“Proper planning is essential when incorporating naming rights into a CRT. It’s about striking a balance between recognition and maintaining the trust’s core charitable purpose.”


Who Is Ted Cook at Point Loma Estate Planning Law, APC.:

Point Loma Estate Planning Law, APC.

2305 Historic Decatur Rd Suite 100, San Diego CA. 92106

(619) 550-7437

Map To Point Loma Estate Planning Law, APC, a wills and trust lawyer near me: https://maps.app.goo.gl/JiHkjNg9VFGA44tf9


  1. wills and trust attorney near me
  2. wills and trust lawyer near me

About Point Loma Estate Planning:



Secure Your Legacy, Safeguard Your Loved Ones. Point Loma Estate Planning Law, APC.

Feeling overwhelmed by estate planning? You’re not alone. With 27 years of proven experience – crafting over 25,000 personalized plans and trusts – we transform complexity into clarity.

Our Areas of Focus:

Legacy Protection: (minimizing taxes, maximizing asset preservation).

Crafting Living Trusts: (administration and litigation).

Elder Care & Tax Strategy: Avoid family discord and costly errors.

Discover peace of mind with our compassionate guidance.

Claim your exclusive 30-minute consultation today!


If you have any questions about: Can an Advance Healthcare Directive help avoid unwanted medical treatment?

OR

How can estate planning contribute to a secure financial future?

and or:
How can estate administration protect beneficiaries from legal disputes?

Oh and please consider:
What problems did Robert encounter as an inexperienced executor?
Please Call or visit the address above. Thank you.